I made recently some f4-statistics in purpose to find out the Scandinavian admixture among East Europeans and Finns. My formula was
f4(test,West-Finland;Norwegian,Mbuti)
The result made me wondering how much the genetic structure of sample groups has effect on the result:
Lithuania West-Finland : Norway MBUTI 0.0027 2.905
Poland West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0004 -0.583
Belarussia West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0013 -1.620
RU_Smolensk West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0002 -0.155
RU_west West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0030 -3.779
RU_Tver West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0031 -2.589
RU-Kostr West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0054 -5.131
Romania West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0105 -10.318
Bulgaria West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0094 -10.234
Ukraine West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0033 -4.404
Chuvash West-Finland : Norway MBUTI -0.0231 -24.172
Chuvashes are for a control purpose.
The result shows that the Lithuanians show more common admixture with Norwegians than the Finns do and they are the only group exceeding Western Finnish - Norwegian admixture.
Lithuanians share also more admixture with Chuvashes than Mordvas and
North-Russians do. They show more admixture than their neighbours, as
well in east as in west.
Mordva Lithuania : Chuvash MBUTI -0.0039 -4.050
RU_Vologda Lithuania : Chuvash MBUTI -0.0033 -3.406
Then I replaced the data base to the one published by Lazaridis et al. 2014, to confirm this observation. I also changed the outgroup to Chimp. There are some differences in sample groups, so also some differences are expected, but this result confirms what I got in the first test.
D stat Z
Lithuanian West-Finnish : Norwegian Chimp 0.0032 2.818
Belarusian West-Finnish : Norwegian Chimp -0.0026 -2.291
Bulgarian West-Finnish : Norwegian Chimp -0.0091 -7.949
Chuvash West-Finnish : Norwegian Chimp -0.0248 -20.419
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Monday, February 23, 2015
Aineiston lisäys sisältäen vepsät, karjalaiset ym.
Estonian Biocentre julkaisi uutta dataa, josta julkaisen nyt vain PCA-plotit. Palaan asiaan jatkoanalyysien muodossa lähiaikoina, parin viikon kuluessa.
Lisäys 24.2.15
Testausta IMS-taustaisten keskinäisistä suhteista. Lataa paketti tästä. Dimensioiden 2 ja 3 Eigenvalue-arvot ovat kaikissa kuvissa hyvin lähellä toisiaan, joten dim. 2 ja 3 ovat täysin vertailukelpoisia, ja joskus asetelmat vaihtavat paikkaa.
Lisäys 24.2.15
Testausta IMS-taustaisten keskinäisistä suhteista. Lataa paketti tästä. Dimensioiden 2 ja 3 Eigenvalue-arvot ovat kaikissa kuvissa hyvin lähellä toisiaan, joten dim. 2 ja 3 ovat täysin vertailukelpoisia, ja joskus asetelmat vaihtavat paikkaa.
Friday, February 13, 2015
A new study reveals more ancient East European migrations
This is really big news because we probably can in nearest future understand much better the origin of present-day Europeans, thanks for new ancient East European samples. It is also sure that speculative flames will now go high, but I am not going to take a stance on this before I have the new data, especially regarding new Yamna culture samples. The reason to wait is that Haak et al. obviously uses same small and unclassified Finnish sample set than Lazaridis 2014 et al. Anyway, here is the link, Haak et al.
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/10/013433.full.pdf
I am also running a big European wide analysis using Chromopainter and Finestucture in linked mode. It will be ready after two weeks or so. Link to the software: http://www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~madjl/finestructure-old/chromopainter.html
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/10/013433.full.pdf
I am also running a big European wide analysis using Chromopainter and Finestucture in linked mode. It will be ready after two weeks or so. Link to the software: http://www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~madjl/finestructure-old/chromopainter.html