The genetic
origin of Finns is for the big public unknown.
If you follow the public discussion,
including random scientific views, you find ideas that resemble more a conspiracy
theory than common sense. It is hard to
find neutral scientific work with natural explanations. I am going to bite a small piece of this cake. Unfortunately I can’t do very inclusive work
because I have not same resources than professional scientists working with
resources they have, but I have my liberty to do my own work. It is not away from anyone. It is possible to do fair work if you
familiarize yourself with methods and data, and you know something about the
Finnish history.
Test goals
My goal is
to see what is common with Eastern Finns and two key populations in Russia;
Mordovians and North Asians. Finnish scientists
define Eastern Finns as a mixture of Karelians and Tavastians. The history of Tavastians is quite well
documented by linguists and archaeologists from the first millennium and there
is no reason to ponder who they are. Tavastians are ancient Finns who
have lived in Finland a very long time.
The history of Karelians is less clear.
They appeared to the historical scene around 1000 years ago, just after
the Slavic eastern expansion started.
During those times numerous Finnic speaking groups lived in the area of present-day
Russia. There are many possibilities
for the origin of Karelians; they can be their own origin or a mix of several
Finnic groups to the east from Finland or in the neighborhood of ancient
Tavastians in Finland. Today Finnish
enthusiasts have done great work with the East Finnish Ydna and resolved routes
where their paternal lines came from.
Mostly Eastern Finnish paternal results suggest the origin from Russia,
inside the area from Finland to near Moscow. But my goal is to see inside autosomal genetic
ancestry. Autosomal genes tell more
about admixtures between populations.
Additionally
I try to find out the possible Asian admix among Eastern Finns. As I earlier found the North Asian admixture
usually seen among Finns is vague. Look at
here and here. It exists only if we use samples
from Mediterranean or Atlantic regions, or from Central Europe with prominent Mediterranean
or Atlantic affinity. Obviously those
samples dominate the test arrangement and assign some Northeast European genetic
attributes to North Asian, if they are common with them. The lesson would be: don’t use presumable non-ancestral samples if
you want to make good analyses in certain time span. Easier said than done.
Test arrangement
Samples
- Han Chinese – defining East Asian affinity
- Nganassans – defining North Asian affinity
- Mordovians – defining Northeast European / East-Finnic ancestry
- Belorussians – defining Slavic ancestry
- Scandinavians – defining Fennoscandinavian ancestry
- East Finns – 3 samples
- West Finns – 5 samples for comparison
Data selections
and preparation
- Asian and North/Northeast European groups are around in same size to prevent under/oversampling in finding Asian admixtures.
- Mordovians are selected using pre-analysis including individuals with most Finnish looking genetic profile. Another end of Mordovians resembles Slavs.
- Nganassans are pruned, without outliers. Outliers had European admixture around 10-50%.
- Scandinavians are the group with least Finnish admixture, selected using pre-analysis. Two of them in my Scandinavian sample group (7 individuals) were dropped out for this reason.
Software
- Structure 2.3.4 (rel. 2012)
- run parameter: initial 20000 cycles, analysis 200000 cycles
Results
K=3
Pop 1 2 3 Individuals
Han: 0,996 0,003 0,000 10
Ngan: 0,971 0,029 0,000 9
Mrd: 0,003 0,279 0,718 5
EFinn: 0,004 0,303 0,693 3
Belarus:0,001 0,014 0,985 5
Scand: 0,001 0,016 0,983 5
Han: 0,996 0,003 0,000 10
Ngan: 0,971 0,029 0,000 9
Mrd: 0,003 0,279 0,718 5
EFinn: 0,004 0,303 0,693 3
Belarus:0,001 0,014 0,985 5
Scand: 0,001 0,016 0,983 5
No comments:
Post a Comment
English preferred, because readers are international.
No more Anonymous posts.