QpAdm results are made using distant ancestral references (the right-file) to get best possible coverage. While these results are very reasonable, it is possible to fine-tune all results by using carefully selected less distant references. So these results are directional.
All Finnish groups are from the 1000-genomes project and cover full 1MSNP's, as well as all other groups on the second and third plots. I have seen in my work that testing ancient and modern samples calls for equal coverage of all modern sample groups.
What kind of Fennoscandinavian was the RISE174/Scania_IA? Definitely she was not like a present-day Swede, we can see it in following f3-result below and on PCA-plots.
Next here is a simple PCA-plot, somewhat imperfect one and flat due to a high amount of Asian influence and too few European samples. This plot shows a new Finnish group, Finnx, and binds it to the Finnish ancestry. Finnx forms an ordinary Finnish group with less present-day Swedish admixture than typical Southwest Finns, but also less genetic drift than typical East Finns.
F3-test showing common genetic drift with Scania_IA:
First some European groups in a demonstrative purpose.
South Italians
Chisq and tail prob: 0.436 0.932651
Populations: Beaker_Central_Europe, Iran_LN, Levant_BA
best coefficients: 0.299 0.169 0.531
Jackknife mean: 0.299685849 0.169473438 0.530840713
std. errors: 0.028 0.032 0.033
North Italians
Chisq and tail prob: 1.738 0.628609
Populations: Beaker_Central_Europe, Levant_BA, Iran_LN
best coefficients: 0.542 0.416 0.042
Jackknife mean: 0.542422483 0.415568791 0.042008725
std. errors: 0.019 0.020 0.020
Basques
Chisq and tail prob: 1.789 0.774528
Populations: Beaker_Central_Europe, Iberia_EN
best coefficients: 0.578 0.422
Jackknife mean: 0.579234989 0.420765011
std. errors: 0.030 0.030
Latvians
Chisq and tail prob: 1.101 0.77684
Populations: Scania_IA, Latvia_MN, Evenk
best coefficients: 0.920 0.092 -0.012
Jackknife mean: 0.918423990 0.093588254 -0.012012243
std. errors: 0.042 0.042 0.016
Poles
Chisq and tail prob: 1.699 0.790857
Populations: Poltavka, Germany_MN
best coefficients: 0.502 0.498
Jackknife mean: 0.502425062 0.497574938
std. errors: 0.039 0.039
Estonians
Chisq and tail prob: 0.642 0.886697
Populations: Scania_IA, Latvia_MN, Evenk
best coefficients: 0.933 0.052 0.015
Jackknife mean: 0.931374297 0.053427705 0.015197998
std. errors: 0.039 0.038 0.015
Mordvas
Chisq and tail prob: 0.503 0.973198
Populations: Sarmatian, Scania_IA
best coefficients: 0.472 0.528
Jackknife mean: 0.475543261 0.524456739
std. errors: 0.079 0.079
Swedes
Chisq and tail prob: 1.003 0.9093
Populations: Latvia_LN, England_N
best coefficients: 0.523 0.477
Jackknife mean: 0.520472837 0.479527163
std. errors: 0.052 0.052
Finnx
Chisq and tail prob: 1.647 0.648853
Populations: Scania_IA, Latvia_MN, Evenk
best coefficients: 0.851 0.084 0.065
Jackknife mean: 0.849474735 0.085348593 0.065176672
std. errors: 0.037 0.036 0.014
Some "what if" analyses:
What if Mordvas are Polish
Chisq and tail prob: 11.941 0.0177937
Populations: Poltavka, Germany_MN
best coefficients: 0.727 0.273
Jackknife mean: 0.724786064 0.275213936
std. errors: 0.047 0.047
What if Latvians are Polish
Chisq and tail prob: 9.038 0.0601576
Populations: Poltavka, Germany_MN
best coefficients: 0.563 0.437
Jackknife mean: 0.562264229 0.437735771
std. errors: 0.049 0.049
What if Finnx's are Mordva
Chisq and tail prob: 4.728 0.316351
Populations: Sarmatian, Scania_IA
best coefficients: 0.369 0.631
Jackknife mean: 0.377367376 0.622632624
std. errors: 0.093 0.093
What if East Finns are Mordvas
Chisq and tail prob: 6.593 0.159
Populations: Sarmatian, Scania_IA
best coefficients: 0.317 0.683
Jackknife mean: 0.329388055 0.670611945
std. errors: 0.118 0.118
What if Swedes are Baltic
Chisq and tail prob: 1.867 0.867159
Population: Scania_IA, Latvia_MN, Evenk
best coefficients, Jackknife optimisation is negative, 1.000 0.000 -0.000
The results above show the continuum of Scania_IA from Southern Sweden to Russia, to the area where Mordvas live. Those populations living in eastern and western areas have however different admixtures, Mordvas lack Baltic middle-neolithic ancestry and show instead late East European Steppe -like admixture, Sarmatians suggesting incursions of the Iranian speakers. What is also remarkable is that the best Swedish result doesn't include Scania_IA. This doesn't mean that they have not Iron Age ancestry from Scania and in reality they are really close Scania_IA. It means only that present-day Swedes are slightly different, own later admixtures and lack of certain older Baltic admixtures.